Quickr or Windows SharePoint Services - compare it
I spoke with a few people about SharePoint (I don't care about the edition at this moment too much) and when I say "it looks sexy" nobody knows what I mean. So, take a look.
Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services
Decent text, just a few colors, a lot of white space, plenty of space for all the information I need. I can get a lot of announcements there as well as contacts, links and so on.
Lotus Quickr
Colors, a lot of fonts and almost no space for the data I need. I was able to get just few announcements and some contacts on the page (even I have high screen resolution).
I know, it is possible to change the layout, but when you compare the default one, which one looks better? At least WSS doesn't need Java :-(
Technorati: Microsoft WSS IBM Lotus Lotus Quickr
Quickr or Windows SharePoint Services - compare it
yes, agreed. This is actually the first Time I've seen Quickr, and I'm unimpressed. I'm pretty sure I know what market IBM is targeting, but the giant fonts and icons tell me that I might be wrong.
I'm a bit of a freak for order and simplicity of design, but apparently it's not just me that thinks this shouldn't be the default layout.
Quickr or Windows SharePoint Services - compare it
are you planning compare this products at others branches?
Re: Quickr or Windows SharePoint Services - compare it
Sure, plan to go more deeply when i'll know more.
Quickr or Windows SharePoint Services - compare it
...sharepoint looks just like GoogleDocs :o)
Re: Quickr or Windows SharePoint Services - compare it
@4 which means it looks really nice :)